5/18/2005

sequence

paul thinks that the sky isn't colored by the octopus. i disagree. i try not to be a skeptic, i prefer more of a firm realism. i know that the logic isn't perfect but if it all stays sequential the point is made. when things can be arranged in nice even lines it all makes sense, could you jump into physics on the day the third law of thermodynamics was put out? maybe. probably not. i remember the first time i saw a flow chart in elementary school, whatever the topic was it all made sense after that. the octopus doesn't need logic, he doesn't need me talking about his work, he doesn't need anything. i'm just pointing out the obvious. i think paul's attitude is flawed because he can't see the sky with the regularity i see. if anyone could see the sky before dawn every day it would be hard to deny the artist's work. smooth morning food makes the sky slide past without any friction. good coffee sharpens the sky's color, hard to do at 5 a.m. that usually cames after the sky turns into the brighter morning light. all part of the order.

No comments: